Why Smart Women Podcast
Welcome to the Why Smart Women Podcast, hosted by Annie McCubbin. We explore why women sometimes make the wrong choices and offer insightful guidance for better, informed decisions. Through engaging discussions, interviews, and real-life stories, we empower women to harness their intelligence, question their instincts, and navigate life's complexities with confidence. Join us each week to uncover the secrets of smarter decision-making and celebrate the brilliance of women everywhere.
Why Smart Women Podcast
When Kevin the tortoise and Squeaky the monkey have a chat..
Proudly sponsored by COUP — helping brands cut through the noise with bold, smart marketing. Visit the http://coup.co website or book a meeting with us at. https://go.oncehub.com/RequestMeeting
You are listening to the why Smart Women podcast, the podcast that helps smart women work out why we repeatedly make the wrong decisions and how to make better ones. From relationships, career choices, finances, to faux fur, jackets and kale smoothies. Every moment of every day, we're making decisions. Let's make them good ones. I'm your host, annie McCubbin, and, as a woman of a certain age, I've made my own share of really bad decisions. Not my husband, I don't mean him, though I did go through some shockers to find him, and I wish this podcast had been around to save me from myself. This podcast will give you insights into the working of your own brain, which will blow your mind. I acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which I'm recording and you are listening on this day. Always was, always will be Aboriginal land. Well, hello smart women, and welcome back to the why Smart Women podcast. Here I am sitting in my apartment in DY, new South Wales, australia, with David. Hello David.
Speaker 2:Good afternoon.
Speaker 1:Good afternoon. I tell you I don't want to brag.
Speaker 2:I do not want to brag. Are you sure about that?
Speaker 1:Yeah, it is ridiculously nice. I've been in the city today doing some coaching and it's this perfect spring sort of warm but not hot weather. It's beautiful.
Speaker 2:It's lovely. Why is that bragging?
Speaker 1:Well, because there'll be people that are listening to this that are in nasty weather.
Speaker 2:Oh yeah.
Speaker 1:Glum weather or unpleasant weather or rainy weather.
Speaker 2:Sorry about that. Sorry if your weather's not good. Yeah, it is nice here today, I believe in a recent podcast you shared some of your book with people. You know your emerging embryonic book at the moment.
Speaker 1:I did, and since then I did do that, I did do that, and since then I have had some regret.
Speaker 2:Oh really.
Speaker 1:Well, a little bit, because well, for instance, I was talking to my friend Odile yesterday and for anybody who listens regularly, odile Leclasio is the actor who plays the voice, who plays the character of Cat, so she voices her in my other two books. But anyway, I was talking to her yesterday about the book I'm writing about the wild birth, which is where people birth without any medical intervention, knowledge or interference and it's extremely dangerous and mothers and babies keep dying because it comes under the everything natural safe mantle, which is crap, because women died and still do die when they don't have medical support constantly because childbirth is natural but potentially dangerous. Anyway, I was telling Odile and Odile had read that draft, how I've written it that the character is birthing in Lawson in the Blue Mountains in a snowstorm in the middle of winter, and I had it that the room was freezing and she'd been in this unheated birthing pool for three days. And Odile said to me well, why is the room cold?
Speaker 2:Someone left the window open.
Speaker 1:Because I'd had the windows open. I don't know why I'd written that, but I had and she said why is the room freezing and how are they heating the water? And I said they're not. And I said she said so what? She's sitting in cold water in a freezing room for three days. I said yeah, and she said well, she'd be dead from hypothermia, and that was a good point. So I've had to now go back and rewrite. Right, I had to do a massive rewrite.
Speaker 1:There's other things that are wrong with it as well, but the thing about it is that the character, the central character that I'm writing so her sister has decided to have this unmedicalised, unsupported wild birth because she is how.
Speaker 1:She has bought into this almost cult-like philosophy that women know how to birth, like animals know how to birth, and it's just doctors just interfere in that process and something goes badly wrong at the end of the birth.
Speaker 1:I won't say what, but the doula or the midwife is going to end up in a court case being held accountable for this disaster that happens at the end of this wild birth.
Speaker 1:But the character the sister of Harper, who's actually gone through the wild birth and um, but the character the sister of harper, who's actually gone through the wild birth, refuses to acknowledge this is the mother who's been through this disastrous three days of excruciating birthing, and she refuses to acknowledge that the midwife is culpable, when clearly the midwife has encouraged her to go down this route and she has done that. But then Beth, the sister, the lead girl's sister, who's been through this terrible birth, keeps saying well, this is what happened, it was meant to be. The universe has prevailed and tragedy is as valid as triumph. So she holds this reality, which then exonerates um the midwife and herself from any responsibility for this disaster which I will not describe exactly what it is because I don't want to give it away um which, of course, is a massive post-rationalization of a bad decision yeah and, as we know, we make decisions all the time based on the emotional fluxes of our brain, and then we post-rationalize, and don't we david?
Speaker 2:yeah, yeah and um, and and, and I'm just sort of thinking about the kind of thought process, the character who has decided to have the wild birth and refuses to accept that the doula is culpable.
Speaker 1:And all the way through it, she's refusing to accept that she needed to get help. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2:And so, you know, I don't know what it's going to be like, you know, coming from the mouth of a male, but I know that there is this idea which is my body, my life, my decision. You know, my body, my life, my decision. If I elevate that to a certain height, then I'm going to make a bad decision, you know. Possibly, I mean for some people. I mean, you know, you say that women die in childbirth all the time. Well, they do.
Speaker 1:Well, they certainly do in third world countries. Okay, yeah, and just walk through a cemetery here and you'll see how many children died of perfectly of diseases that they are now vaccinated against. Except if you're an anti-vaxxer, then you don't. The child recently died of measles. Of course it's just madness.
Speaker 2:I tend to think a couple of generations ago, when there wasn't this medical intervention, this wasn't this support, there wasn't the education around it. When there wasn't this medical intervention this wasn't this support, there wasn't the education around it it was more commonplace for families to have a lot of children because they knew that one or two of them were probably going to die 100%.
Speaker 2:My father was the first born, the second born. He only found out that there was a second born when he was in his 50s, because what my grandparents did was that their relationship was so close. My grandmother my grandmother on my father's side had that baby. The baby died and no one talked about it and it was just. It was never referred to again. So, yeah, my father had a sibling who died at childbirth and it was just completely swept under the carpet. You know nobody. It was just completely normalized under the carpet. It was just completely normalized. They got on with their life.
Speaker 1:It's so that period isn't it? When it was like I know I grew up with my parents saying, in some cultures life is cheap, I remember as a child thinking, oh okay, they mustn't care if life is cheap, they mustn't care if a child dies. But it's not the truth. It's just a different way of handling loss and, I guess, and death than now. We acknowledge the pain, we acknowledge the fracture in the family. We acknowledge that it's going to have a kick-on effect to other people in the family.
Speaker 2:Look, we now refuse to accept that a woman in childbirth should be subject to the dangers, just the very natural dangers, of the way that homo sapiens reproduce. It's much harder on the women than it is on the men.
Speaker 1:Capuchin monkeys, I think, do it really easily. Capuchin monkeys, I think so it's quite good.
Speaker 2:Well, there you go, you could have the Capuchin monkeys, I think, do it really easily, capuchin monkeys. I think so it's quite good. Well, there you go, you could have the Capuchin method.
Speaker 1:You could have. Yeah, I think they. In fact I'm going to. Yeah, no, I won't look it up, but I know in another chapter of the book I've written about Capuchin monkeys and how they. I don't know I could be making this up 10 minutes or something. It's really quick.
Speaker 2:But look, I think what you're saying.
Speaker 1:I'd like to be a capuchin monkey.
Speaker 2:I can't help you with that, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1:If I believed in reincarnation, which I don't believe in it.
Speaker 2:You'd be a little monkey.
Speaker 1:I wouldn't mind it I wouldn't choose a monkey myself. I wouldn't mind being a little capuchin. They're super cute. They swing around in the jungle making really cute noises at each other.
Speaker 2:I think I'd be a Galapagos tortoise.
Speaker 1:Is that because you want to live to 100?
Speaker 2:Oh no, it's a nice life.
Speaker 1:What would your name be? I'd call you.
Speaker 2:Kevin, kevin, kevin the turtle.
Speaker 1:Don't you reckon what?
Speaker 2:would my name be if I was a capuchin?
Speaker 1:monkey Annie.
Speaker 2:Annie, now, if you're a capuchin monkey, this is the most ridiculous diversion that you've gone down. I know but Okay, if you were a monkey We'd be friends, you know, I would call you. I certainly wouldn't call her Blodwen. Yeah, I would call you. Yeah, what Squeaky.
Speaker 1:No, yeah, what Squeaky? No, not squeaky. You'd be very squeaky as a kombucha monkey. I'm sure you would be. You can keep talking while I look up how long it takes them to give birth.
Speaker 2:Go on.
Speaker 1:Goodness, gracious me, off you go.
Speaker 2:I think the point that we're making and you'll correct me, I have no doubt about that if you think I'm wrong is that the current state of affairs when it comes to childbirth is that in first world countries we accept, we embrace the kind of support that women are given when they're going through that incredibly tumultuous For some people easy they have a capucha monkey birth Great, lovely Congratulations. But the fact is that other people have tremendous challenges and you know, without without disclosing too much about the birth of both of our children, there is no way that I think anybody would have survived had there not been some.
Speaker 1:You know the medical intervention that you had oh, I would, I would have, yeah, everyone would have done probably both times dreadful, just absolutely dreadful. I'm super, super lucky I was in hospital right, yeah, okay, I'm not lucky. It's because I used my brain and went to a hospital.
Speaker 2:Yeah, yeah, but you were lucky that you had the brain and the culture where you realised that that was your priority. Not everybody, you know. We sometimes look at people who make good decisions and their life, you know, goes in a very good direction because of that and we think, oh yeah, you know, it's a, you know, it's just a function of the good decisions that you've made.
Speaker 1:Listen to this.
Speaker 2:Oh, you've got your figure now, this is the.
Speaker 1:this is gestation periods. It won't give me the actual birth.
Speaker 2:Okay, it's giving me gestation periods. How long does it take to grow a monkey in your belly?
Speaker 1:No, no, I'm diverting. The whale shark, which is the largest fish in the ocean, has a gestation period. Can you imagine this, especially if you had morning sickness? That can span 3.5 years, but they're swimming.
Speaker 2:Okay, they don't have to carry the baby around.
Speaker 1:Oh yeah, that's true.
Speaker 2:So you know they're like in a permanent float tank.
Speaker 1:Oh, that's true. This is for some reason, this is not giving me. I can distinctly remember reading the duration of their pregnancy is five to six months, so that's pretty good. I didn't want to know that.
Speaker 2:I would have thought that it wouldn't have been that much shorter to create a capuchin.
Speaker 1:Monkey baby in the womb.
Speaker 2:I wouldn't have thought that that would have been much shorter than it would take to grow a human being. I mean of course we're bigger. But if you think about those little monkeys when they're born, I think don't they have to immediately be able to grip so that they don't fall.
Speaker 1:Human immediately be able to grip a grip so that they don't fall. Human babies are useless. Listen to this. The animal with the shortest pregnancy is the striped-faced dunnett, which is spelt D-U-N-N-A-R-T.
Speaker 2:Is it?
Speaker 1:a mammal I'm about to tell you. It's a small Australian marsupial with a gestation period of approximately 11 days 11 days. Well, you know, marsupials, I want to come back as a dunnit.
Speaker 2:As a dunnit, you know that when marsupials give birth, it's almost like they're giving birth to a little partially formed embryo and then they do the rest of their development in the pouch.
Speaker 1:But that's incredible Only 11 days. But listen to this the Virginia. If it's got an O before opossum, is that just possum?
Speaker 2:No, that's an opossum. Opossums are different to possums, actually.
Speaker 1:The Virginia opossum also has an extremely short pregnancy, lasting only 12 to 13 days. They're both marsupials, meaning the young are born in a highly underdeveloped state and continue to develop in the mother's pouch All right.
Speaker 2:Who are you? Bindi Irwin.
Speaker 1:I know I don't know what's happened to me. I'm now going when I'm reincarnated.
Speaker 2:Oh, you want to be an opossum.
Speaker 1:No, I want to be a dunnet.
Speaker 2:A dunnet.
Speaker 1:A dunnet A. A dunnett, a little australian marsupial, and the one, the animal that has the hardest birth. Oh, is the giraffe, of course, but it's only what. It's only has 30 to 60 minutes of labor. I've gone off the, I've gone, I've lost the plot. Anyway, my point is that we have all this help and people still make terrible decisions that endanger their lives and the lives of their babies, and then they post-rationalise it about something, about freedom and whatever.
Speaker 2:Freedom and whatever it's very articulate of you. Thank you, look, and it's not just hearsay or urban myths, we've got a number of anecdotes you know, people that we know.
Speaker 2:You know, I remember one chap thought it would be lovely for his partner to give birth in an ocean pool and get this. You know, know. They choose a remote ocean pool. That was, you know, miles and miles away from not only just the nearest hospital but the nearest settlement. So there they are in this you know lovely ocean pool and she's having contractions and all of that. Something went wrong amazing, did it?
Speaker 1:how incredible that something can go wrong in the birth process, as it can, as it can go wrong, and the baby died, of course, you know, no, no, of course, and that's terrible yeah and people are vulnerable to these false narratives and these cult-like thinking and this is the point I think some people, sometimes smart women, do make bad decisions or smart people make bad decisions. Smart people make bad decisions.
Speaker 2:You know, we have some did you know that that was the title of your first book?
Speaker 1:Thank, you yeah, yeah, good, I just wondered whether if you'd understand.
Speaker 2:So I think the reality that we're acknowledging is that sometimes smart women make bad decisions, if I could use the title of your book. But you know, some people make bad decisions.
Speaker 1:And it's not particularly relevant, is it? I'll just get closer to the mic. And relevant, is it? Oh, let's get closer to the mic. And the people that we know? We have a number of people in our friendship group who have parents, who have and are making poor decisions in relation to their own families, and it's they're not dumb. This is not a lack of intellect, yeah, yeah yeah, yeah, and, and, and, and, so I guess.
Speaker 2:Um, I think, I think what we're guess, I think what we were talking about earlier today is that a lot of people of our generation, you know in our 30s, 40s and 50s or so, we are in. I called it the hamburger generation, but you called it the sandwich generation.
Speaker 1:It's the sandwich generation. You're dealing with children. Okay, yes, and you're dealing with aging parents, aging parents At the sandwich generation. You're dealing with children, okay, yes, and you're dealing with ageing parents. Ageing parents At the same time. At the same time.
Speaker 2:And what I think both of those two groups have in common is that there is a desire for agency. So we all know that. Children, you know they sometimes want to have more responsibility.
Speaker 1:Like teenagers Like teenagers.
Speaker 2:You know they want to go out, they want to drive. You know they want to. You know, have certain relationships with people and, as a parent, you look at that and you go. Well, hang on a minute, I don't know that you are equipped to make good decisions about. You know what you do, what you eat. You know how you spend your time, what you put into your body.
Speaker 1:And we know that there's a lot of risk taking in that cohort in those teenage years because, especially in boys, the prefrontal cortex, so the the part of your brain that is involved in rational thinking, executive function, decision making and risk management, that that part of your brain in males doesn't develop until they're 25. And I would say I know a lot of males where it hasn't developed in them.
Speaker 2:Them at all.
Speaker 1:They're in their 50s and we're still waiting for that prefrontal, not you, I wasn't meaning you. No, no, no, no, no, no. But we're still waiting for that prefrontal, not you?
Speaker 2:What's the meaning of you?
Speaker 1:No, no, no, no, no, no, but we're still waiting for that prefrontal cortex to come online.
Speaker 2:Okay, so you've just moved from fact. And yes, we do know that there's an evolutionary advantage for young men to be risk-taking.
Speaker 1:And what is that? Please extrapolate.
Speaker 2:Well, I mean it's because that's how people learn, it's how you find what you're capable of being in the world, in the environment.
Speaker 1:Pushing the boundaries. Pushing the boundaries.
Speaker 2:And if we think about the role of young men.
Speaker 1:And also being attractive to the females right.
Speaker 2:Okay, young men in primitive communities. They needed to do things that were a bit risky. They needed to go hunting. They might need to go to war. They needed to go hunting, they might need to go to war. They need to be able to demonstrate that they could protect those that are in their care. So the only way that they get those skills for protection is to put themselves into some danger, learn how to deal with it, and so that kind of rational, more risk-averse, more conservative thinking actually doesn't come online in the male brain until our mid-20s.
Speaker 1:Until they're 50.
Speaker 2:And the thing is and this is the thing that I think that you've been noticing is that sometimes and you are actually talking a bit more about the males of the species- I am talking about them.
Speaker 1:Sorry, I don't mean to be pejorative.
Speaker 2:Yep, older men. Here's the construct that there are some older men who are actually not making very good decisions about how they spend their twilight years or their sunset years, or whatever you want to call it. They're not making good decisions about the kind of environment that they live in or the people that they hang out with, or what they do with their acquired wealth.
Speaker 1:And I think that's right. And if I sort of look around the cohort of my friends, I can think of four examples where the men have either their partner has either died or there has been a divorce and without the steadying hand of the female they have lost the plot yeah, I would say, gone off the rails.
Speaker 2:You know, let me describe, I guess, the no names, no pack drill. You know the archetypical. It's almost like the pilgrim's progress, the hero's journey.
Speaker 1:But the kind of journey that you are talking about here is that when a man of a certain age finds himself with assets and time on their hands and and let's just remind ourselves that those assets were built up in a union by them and their wife, and the wife has either passed away or the wife they are divorced. But they didn't do it on their own.
Speaker 1:Those assets were built either with the support that they could work, because the wife, especially in that generation, stayed at home and reared their children, or else the wife was also working. So the asset that was built up is not theirs alone. And yet there is this sense well, it's mine, I'll do what I like with it which is not right and ethically incorrect right.
Speaker 2:Well, you know the Ethically iffy, Ethically iffy, so the spectrum of decisions that one could make in that particular period. Let's imagine that you've left a union, you now are independent, Perhaps you still have a relationship of the offspring of that union. So there's your family, there's your family. You could really focus on them, you could be of service to them, you could enjoy their company, you could get to know them more, you could get to know them as growing adults, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2:But what we do notice, in enough of these circumstances, that we have observed that there is an archetypical story about a man of a certain age. What do you want to call it? Falling in love or getting attached, or being that they are. You know that they can start again with another partner, Generally younger, and generally younger. You know that they can start again. They can have another relationship, they can help that. They can start again. They can have another relationship. They can help another younger woman perhaps, you know, realise her potential. You know, by being the benefactor and we've seen interest in the biological family wane with the new interest in the new relationship- yeah, I think it's right.
Speaker 1:There is a waning of interest in the new relationship. Yeah, yeah, I think it's right.
Speaker 1:There is a waning of interest in the original family and a sort of uptick of interest in the new family yes um, and it does definitely just in our experience, and of course this is anecdotal, this is not data, but in our experience it is these older men, and I think there's a sense of flattery with it, don't you think that a younger woman is interested in them, and a sense of new and exciting things. You know, the old life was maybe a bit boring, a bit pedestrian, yes, a bit boring a bit pedestrian.
Speaker 1:Yes, but the thing about it is that, as, how do people, how does the original family like the children, the adult children that have sort of been left aside, how do they intervene in this process? Because in our experience, what happens is as soon as there is infirmity or an ailment with the, with the older male, the reliance on the original family is reignited. So yeah, and actually I can think of four examples of this where the, the older male, left family, gone to the new one and then, as soon as they get sick, the new family is disinterested because they're older and they need things.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And then they return into the fold. Yeah, it happened to a friend of mine.
Speaker 2:The prodigal dad.
Speaker 1:The prodigal dad. It happened to a friend of mine and so he left the family, went to this much, much younger woman who had a small child, moved in with her, or she moved in with him, did all the caring for the child, and then he had a heart condition and my friend was rung by the young woman and said well, I can't look after me, he needs to come to you. Can you, can you take him to an appointment? Can he come and stay with you and um, and then, of course, because it's your, it's in, you know you're genetically attached. Then you're in this awful, invidious position where you're like, well, I haven't seen you for a decade and you've built a new life, but now you need me. What do I do? It's awful.
Speaker 2:And you can't turn your back on a parent. You know your mum or your dad, no, and I notice that we're being very cautious to be yeah, to be transparent about the fact is, you know, we haven't looked at the double blind study, we haven't looked at the social research on this. We're going much more off our own experience.
Speaker 1:Anecdote by anecdote.
Speaker 2:Anecdotal experience which, as we know, is not the whole story, but was it on Netflix that we saw the Four Seasons? Now, the Four Seasons was originally a film made by Alan Alda.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:It's really good Tina Fey, steve Carell fantastic cast. They've done a reboot of the Four Seasons.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And it was presented as a four-part miniseries and you know no names, not giving away too many spoilers. It's very much about a man who has decided that he wants to have a relationship with a younger woman and the drama that ensues is all about the soundness or otherwise of his decision making, and we could come from this from the perspective that an older man who wants to start a new life with a new woman or a younger woman or a new family, that doing that is necessarily going to be flawed.
Speaker 1:I don't believe that to be true. Well, if they have managed to do that, there's conditions on that. You can do what you like. You can go and form a new relationship, absolutely, it's within your rights.
Speaker 2:That's right.
Speaker 1:That's the value when it's ethically iffy is where you are distancing yourself from your original family, which might include your adult children and your grandchildren, and then um returning to them when you have need, how, after sort of abandoning them. I find that ethically really awful.
Speaker 2:Yeah, yeah, yeah so. So I mean, if you describe it like that, you know I'll only invest in this relationship when I'm getting my needs met. We know that that's not a recipe for a good relationship.
Speaker 1:Yeah, terrible.
Speaker 2:Yeah, and so look you know I, how do you intervene. Number one how do you intervene?
Speaker 1:Okay, number one they look they probably have the men in my circle. I'm sure have convinced themselves that they're perfectly right, because that's what people do. They make an emotional decision like I just want someone young and it'll make me feel young, and then they post-rationalize it with some sort of frame up that they're doing it for some more moral reason.
Speaker 1:But, really, I think they just like the idea of being with someone younger, and that in itself is not bad. Depends what you do with that, but how. What do we do? Because if someone's acting irrationally, how do you impact on that? Because god knows, there's plenty of it. Yeah, yeah, okay I mean so?
Speaker 2:I mean the, and this is the, this is the, the root challenge of anybody who is interested in critical thinking and supporting other people to make decisions that are good, decisions that are in their own best interests or in the best interests of the family or the community that is going to be supporting them later on in their life. So I mean, you know, sorry to, sorry to get all biblical about it, but in situations, you have gone super biblical lately.
Speaker 1:Can I just say that. You also did some post with Jesus, or something on the Mount?
Speaker 2:No, it wasn't on the Mount. It was Jesus going into the synagogue and turning out the money changes and the merchants.
Speaker 1:So what's with all the biblical?
Speaker 2:references and the pigeon sellers you really want to know.
Speaker 1:No, not really. I don't really like it.
Speaker 2:Well, hang on a second. What you don't like it.
Speaker 1:Not really.
Speaker 2:Do you want me to give it to you in a nutshell? Yeah, yeah, okay. So, coming from a Christian background, I've been trying to make sense of what I think works about that religion from a humanistic point of view, and I've come down to the three instrumental words faith, hope and love.
Speaker 2:And the greatest of these is love. I think it was Matthew 13 or something like that, and it suddenly occurs to me that those three words are probably really good self-instructions for life. So if you have faith, it's not about having to believe in something, but if you have faith, everything's okay. You know everything's going to be all right, but everything's not okay.
Speaker 1:Well, no, everything's okay. You know everything's going to be all right, but everything's not okay. Well, no, everything's no, everything's not okay. Why is everything okay If you, you know, if you've just you know you're living over there in Gaza and you've just had your home destroyed, how is everything okay?
Speaker 2:No, no, no, no, that's not what I'm saying. I'm not talking about.
Speaker 1:The environment is okay, okay but if you take the specifics of of relationships.
Speaker 2:Are you sure you want to go here?
Speaker 1:no, not really, because it might irritate me. Also can I just say one thing is that if I die, yeah or for whatever reason, um if, if, if you divorce me yeah right, let's just say what you're talking about us, us going our separate ways.
Speaker 2:yeah, yeah, I'm having Ryder. I don't want, I'm keeping Ryder. You're saying you don't want Yo-Yo, I do want Yo-Yo, I'll have both the dogs.
Speaker 1:I do want. Oh, look at her. You hurt her feelings.
Speaker 2:No, you hurt her feelings. You were the one who was rejecting her. Well, you just said I want Ryder and Yo-Yo as well. No, and I want to have a functional relationship with the children.
Speaker 1:If you had actually really wanted Yo-Yo, you would have said I want both the dogs, but you gave yourself away, and that is some applied rhetoric right there, I thought nominating Ryder was funnier. Anyway, if I die or something else, bad happens what would I do?
Speaker 2:well, how would faith, hope and love help me in that situation?
Speaker 1:please stop talking about faith, hope and love. It's going to drive me mental um what you well you if you find somebody 30 years younger yeah and then go and I don live in. I don't know where would you go? Go and live in Wagga.
Speaker 2:Wagga.
Speaker 1:No, Nimbin, Go up if you go up north and turn into some sort of anti-vaxxer no, no, no, no and start selling organic vegetables with the girl.
Speaker 2:And if it was a lovely 30-year-old, the first thing that I would do, the first present that I would give her, was your books, and I'd ask her to read them. You know why smart women make bad decisions, why smart women buy the lies. And then I would ask her so what did you think of those books?
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And depending on her response.
Speaker 1:And she'd say is this from your dead wife? Yeah, this is my dead wife's books. Yeah, yeah, you think I'd get a second date.
Speaker 2:I want you to read my dead wife's books and tell me what you think of them.
Speaker 1:Well, I think that this girl's name is Freya.
Speaker 2:Freya. I like the name Freya.
Speaker 1:No, no, no, Her name is Fern.
Speaker 2:No, I like Freya. No, we're going for Fern Fern.
Speaker 1:If you end up up in, where are you going to be? Byron Bay.
Speaker 2:Nimbin.
Speaker 1:Nimbin with Fern.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Now, I don't even believe in the afterlife, but I will come back and I will haunt you and make your life a misery.
Speaker 2:Why, that's not a very loving thing to do. To make my life a misery. I would though. Okay, fine, look, I accept that. So I'll leave you our address in nimbin, that's where we will be.
Speaker 1:We'll be nimba, we won't be anywhere else?
Speaker 2:and what about the dogs?
Speaker 1:the dogs, yo-yo yeah, they're coming with me, even yo-yo, yeah, yeah you know I'm fond of yo-yo.
Speaker 2:I wouldn't leave yo-yo to someone cruel like you.
Speaker 1:I'm I'm not what, oh, this is if we divorce? Yeah, oh, I see, yeah, I see yeah yeah, I mean.
Speaker 2:you know, somebody who does not have faith, hope and love in her heart cannot possibly look after that dog.
Speaker 1:Anyway, but back to. I'm still alive, so we don't have to worry about that currently. How do you intervene in these situations where someone in your life is making decisions that are to their detriment and to the detriment of others? How do you intervene?
Speaker 2:you have to take the speck of dust from your own eye before you can stop being biblical okay um, you have to look at your own thinking first. You've got to look at your own critical thinking first yeah, well, I've done that.
Speaker 1:What next?
Speaker 2:and be methodical and accountable for your application of critical thinking to that situation. Oh my god well.
Speaker 1:That's a whole lot of gobbledygook, it's not.
Speaker 2:It is.
Speaker 1:You said absolutely nothing then. You just liked the sound of yourself saying things.
Speaker 2:No, that's not true. No, look, I'll talk to you about how I would apply it. But you see, the thing is, this is what I find with you sometimes, annie. When I talk about the methodical application of the critical thinking skills that you are teaching, you go yeah, yeah, yeah, right, whatever, you're boring me now.
Speaker 1:Well, I started it. Yeah, I know, you did start it. I started the whole critical thinking thing, so you can't now usurp me.
Speaker 2:I'm not usurping you. I'm not usurping you. I'm just saying you've identified really constructive things to do so that you don't create drama. That's enough. Kevin, what? Kevin the tortoise? Yes, no, okay, so I think, what I would recommend with somebody trying to.
Speaker 1:Okay, let's just say I'm being intractable. If you're being intractable and I've made terrible decisions, go on, have a shot.
Speaker 2:Have a.
Speaker 1:And I'm intractable stubborn and yeah, okay, Go on.
Speaker 2:And I'm intractable, stubborn and gone, yeah, okay, gone, oh well. I'd ask you know what's going on at the moment that makes you think that this is the right decision for you to make?
Speaker 1:Well, I don't know. Help me understand what's going on here. I've made my own decisions and I don't have to answer to anybody.
Speaker 2:Yeah, absolutely. You know that's true. And tell me about not having to answer to anybody. I mean, that just means what?
Speaker 1:Well, I don't have to justify my decision-making to you or anybody. This is a conversation that one of the men had with one of my friends.
Speaker 2:Yeah, can I tell you about my concern?
Speaker 1:Oh Okay, now that is a good point. You have actually made a good point, david oh, have I yeah, because you've you've dropped status, so you're not being inflammatory and you've said can I tell you what?
Speaker 2:that's what I'm concerned about oh, are you concerned?
Speaker 1:I am okay, what are you concerned about?
Speaker 2:okay, oh goodness gracious me, I would pick something specific in terms of you know what might be happening in the future. You know, I know that. You know, I know that. Um, you know, currently you've got this condition under control. Yeah, so it could be a uh, a physical condition. Let's say it's a heart condition. Okay, you know, you've got your heart condition under control.
Speaker 1:Well, I don't actually I've got to have a few stents, a couple of stents put in.
Speaker 2:Yeah, yeah, okay, can I stay with you? Look, absolutely.
Speaker 1:Can I, of course? Oh, really, that's nice. I just need tea and toast in the morning and the newspaper brought to me that I'm good yeah happy to provide. That went well.
Speaker 2:I don't know. Yes, I guess so.
Speaker 1:Well, my friend said no.
Speaker 2:Oh, what did your friend say?
Speaker 1:Your friend said no, I want to be on my own. No, no, no. She just said I can't, we don't have capacity to have you here. We're up and gone at five o'clock in the morning. We've got stairs in the house. What are we going to do?
Speaker 2:Oh right, Okay, so. So if I can't provide tea and toast in the morning, what is this the kind of conversation where I'm going to be saying listen, if you're out, you're out on your own, you can't come back here and we're not going to be able to look after you?
Speaker 1:Is that what you're saying? Well, she just sort of had to say look, I wish we could have you, but unfortunately we're not set up to have you.
Speaker 2:Right, right, right. Well, so you're talking about a different situation.
Speaker 1:Oh, ok, I'm an older male and about to make a bad decision.
Speaker 2:Okay, and so the first thing that I'll ask is okay, so you know what's happening at the moment. You know what are you hoping for, what's ideal for you, what are you moving towards?
Speaker 1:Well, I just like to take it one day at a time.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Okay. I don't like to plan too much in the future.
Speaker 2:Right, yeah, Can I tell me? Can I tell you what my concerns?
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 2:I don't know what the future is going to hold when you're actually going to need a bit more support than you currently need at the moment. Like we know that you've got a heart condition, something physical, or we know that this is your financial situation, or we know that you like to do this particular activity and you want to be able to continue doing that activity, my concern is that if you go in this direction, in this way, 100%, if you're all in, then it's certainly going to get in the way of us being there to help you when you need our help.
Speaker 1:I probably won't need your help.
Speaker 2:Okay, tell me about that.
Speaker 1:Let's explore that.
Speaker 2:What are you thinking? Are you saying how is this going to work? Because I can tell you.
Speaker 1:Well, I've always been pretty independent.
Speaker 2:Yeah, of course you have.
Speaker 1:I mean, I'm 82 now.
Speaker 2:Yes indeed.
Speaker 1:But I'm doing pretty well.
Speaker 2:How long do you think your independence is going to continue, for you know your physical independence.
Speaker 1:Oh well, apart from the heart issue, I don't know I just want to take it a day at a time. Yeah, okay.
Speaker 2:When we get into those days when you actually need continuous help. You know, do I need to spell it out? You know you're this age at the moment. In 15 years' time, 10 years' time, you know, will you still be able to do. You still truly believe that you'll be able to live day by day in 15 years' time, independently?
Speaker 1:Yeah, probably not. I guess the intelligence behind that line of questioning is you're not saying you're wrong, you're not looking at the future, you're not taking care of yourself at the future, you're not taking care of yourself. What you're doing is asking the person who's in current denial to have some curiosity about their own future, and I think that's all we can ever do, isn't it? Really is to try and get them to come to the conclusion themselves, rather than saying you're being an idiot.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:What are you thinking? Eight years' time you're going to be screwed. There's no point because, then they get defensive, but by saying, well, what do you see in the future, how do you see this playing out?
Speaker 2:Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1:Where would you be living? Because we live here. Now. How would we get to you which makes their brains, I guess, get into the problem-solving part of their brain right, which gets them out of that emotional brain where they just want to go la, la, la, la, la. I'm happy, I like it, yeah.
Speaker 2:That is the ideal. One of the things that I know about all of our professional development work and all of the work that we do in terms of coaching and therapy is that I think we're doing a good job when we give people a greater sense of their own agency.
Speaker 1:Absolutely.
Speaker 2:Their own sense of being able to make decisions that are going to impact in positive ways on the things that they care about, be it their own future or the future of their family. Now, the things that we can't control is the things that they care about, be it their own future or the future of their family. Now, the things that we can't control is the things that they care about.
Speaker 2:So if we give someone a wholesale license or wholesale agency to do whatever it is that they want and they are not equipped to make a good decision, then that's probably not a good choice. It's certainly not a good parenting choice.
Speaker 1:Like with the teenager where you go. Yeah, take my car.
Speaker 2:Take my car and, you know, take a bottle of vodka as well because, then you'll be able to smuggle it into the party and get all your friends drunk. You know who wouldn't want to do that as a 16-year-old boy. So there are times when we are parenting, when we have to go. No, I don't think you're equipped to make this particular decision. I think what gets really tricky is when we have to have a similar kind of conversation with um a parent, if you like you know, or one of our elders and you you only again you can look at dramatic art.
Speaker 2:We were talking about the Four Seasons and in the Four Seasons the friends and the family really have to wrestle with whether the guy who has decided to have the relationship with the younger woman.
Speaker 1:After leaving his wife.
Speaker 2:Yeah, after leaving his wife, you know, was this a good decision? Was he using his faculties? Well, we can look at a play like King Lear. Sorry to get all classical on you.
Speaker 1:I'm fine with the classics. I like the classics. I'm just a bit sick of the biblical stuff.
Speaker 2:Okay yes, it's such a small contributor to the life that we lead at the moment. So, if I go to a play like King Lear, king Lear is all about an older male who has a thought in his head which is unrealistic and he won't be persuaded that the way that he is seeing things is suboptimal. He can't see and actually gets aggressive when he defends his right to fundamentally just behave badly in front of his children and the rest of the kingdom.
Speaker 1:so, yeah, there is a challenge that I think well, being defensive is is um is a very natural response.
Speaker 2:Nobody, nobody wants to be criticized nobody wants to have their their agency taken away from them or their or their identity punctured yeah, yeah nobody wants that yeah so being defensive is a very, very natural and human response.
Speaker 1:It's just incredibly unhelpful and difficult to deal with.
Speaker 2:The vexed moment is when you are dealing with, I think, anybody who is a grown adult. You know it could be a parent, it could be an aunt, um, could be a friend, uh, could be a colleague, when they are of the age where you would expect them to have good critical thinking and making good decisions about their future. When they just don't and you then have to say, no, this is no longer your decision.
Speaker 1:Very tricky. It is very tricky and very salient. Well, on that note, Kevin, did you name me my capuchin?
Speaker 2:Yeah, Squeaky.
Speaker 1:I want to be Squeaky.
Speaker 2:I want to be. You're not going to be a capuchin. I'd hate to disappoint you.
Speaker 1:Oh, I'm going to think of a name for myself and come up with it. Anyway, thanks for listening. Smart women Look, all of us have people in our lives who are difficult, difficult situations where we're trying our best to navigate our way through these dynamics of these interpersonal relationships. And I've got to say it's really hard, really hard. But to adopt some of these practices, to try not to get too emotionally aroused by the situation, to try not to bring too much emotion into an already vexed situation which just then inflames things, but to come at it to the best of your ability, from a place of critical analysis of the way you think and then try and get the person that you're talking to to be a bit curious about the way they are seeing their situation, is all we can offer at this point. But I just want to say, if anybody is going through any of this with a family member, it's really tough and I feel for you.
Speaker 2:Sounds like faith and hope to me what you just said.
Speaker 1:Oh my gosh. So thanks for listening. Wherever you are in the world, stay safe, stay well, keep your critical thinking hats on. See you later. Bye.
Speaker 1:Thanks for tuning in to why smart women with me, annie mccubbin. I hope today's episode has ignited your curiosity and left you feeling inspired by my anti-motivational style. Join me next time as we continue to unravel the fascinating layers of our brains and develop ways to sort out the fact from the fiction and the over 6,000 thoughts we have in the course of every day. Remember, intelligence isn't enough. You can be as smart as paint, but it's not just about what you know, it's about how you think. And in all this talk of whether or not you can trust your gut, if you ever feel unsafe, whether it's in the street, at work, in a car park, in a bar or in your own home, please, please respect that gut feeling. Staying safe needs to be our primary objective. We can build better lives, but we have to stay safe to do that. And don't forget to subscribe, rate and review the podcast and share it with your fellow smart women and allies. Together, we're hopefully reshaping the narrative around women and making better decisions. So until next time, stay sharp, stay savvy and keep your critical thinking hat shiny. This is Annie McCubbin signing off from why Smart Women? See you later.
Speaker 1:This episode was produced by Harrison Hess. It was executive produced and written by me, annie McCubbin.
